RE: Automatic Shared Memory question
- To: "Tanel Poder" <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>, "Charles Schultz" <sacrophyte@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:10:43 -0700
I wonder if those buffers stored in the shared pool are being reported
twice in v$sgastat - once under "KGH: NO ACCESS" and again under
"buffer_cache"? That would explain why sum(bytes) from v$sgastat is so
much larger than my sga_target & sga_max_size. I'll see if I can find a
way to confirm this is what's happening . . .
Thanks Tanel for the very insightful information!
-----Original Message-----
From: Tanel Poder [mailto:tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 4:36 AM
Well, believe or not, in addition to keeping private undo and redo
buffers in shared pool, Oracle can nowadays hold some of the buffer
cache there as well.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
