Re: Automatic Shared Memory question

speculating here ...

it is possible that it would represent the difference between sga_max_size
and sga_target? that space would be reserved in anticipation that you might
need it to expand? A quick test would be to increate cache_size by 128M and
see if that makes a correcponding dent in KGH-NO ACCESS.

while on the subject of speculating ... doesn't kgh functions correspond to
heap allocation/deallocation ??

Of course I could be wrong and would welcome corrections.
Raj

Other related posts: