Re: April Security Patches on Windows 2003

  • From: "Andre van Winssen" <awinssen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:38:21 +0200 (CEST)

we have applied patch 5064365 (Release 9.2.0.7 Patch 9 ) succesfully before.
Some things to pay attention to:
- bring down all services/programs that can potentially use Oracle client
libs before you start, including your own sqlplus sessions to bring down
the databases!
- opatch version must be at least 1.0.0.0.55
- set active_state_perl=TRUE and set PERL5LIB to your perllib
- set oracle_home properly

It helps if you can give a brief description of the type of errors you see.

Btw, I noticed today that there's yet another patch on Metalink labeled
5212087 (540K/11-May-2006) According to the description it contains a fix
for DBMS_STATS, I didn't check if 5212087 is a vehicle for fixes of
security issues still open after CPUApr2006.


Regards,
Andre

> Is anybody else having trouble with these patches?  We've tried them
> twice on two different servers and the each install fails with different
> errors.  We've opened up a ticket but aren't making much progress.  It
> feels like Oracle is kind of winging it.  By the time we get this
> solved, if we do, it will be time for the June patches.
>
> Don Freeman
> Database Administrator 1
> Bureau of Information Technology
> Pennsylvania Department of Health
> (717) 703-5782
>
>


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: