Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: "S. Anthony Sequeira" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:16:28 +0100
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 13:59 +0200, Carel-Jan Engel wrote:
> At least I would stronly encourage not to have the standby database
> receiving and/or applying logs whilst the primary is upgraded. Oracle
> docs suggest to do this.
Yes.
> However, what if the upgrade fails? Then you have two databases
> upgraded halfway.
> I never understood why Oracle wants this approach in a HA environment.
Rollback? :)
[...]
--
S. Anthony Sequeira
++
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is
nothing good in war. Except its ending.
-- Abraham Lincoln, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.5
++
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: S. Anthony Sequeira
- Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: S. Anthony Sequeira
- Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
Other related posts:
- » Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » RE: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » RE: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- » RE: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: S. Anthony Sequeira
- Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: S. Anthony Sequeira
- Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
- From: Carel-Jan Engel