RE: Alternatives to using utl_file
- From: TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: JDunn@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:07:27 -0500
sorry i'm coming in on this thread late, so if thats already been
discussed or is not feasible, feel free to hit delete now. :)
if you're doing things dynamically, use the create directory command and
then you dont' have to mess with utl_file_dir. You can create the
directory on the fly, use it and then drop it if need be.
joe
_______________________________________
Joe Testa, Oracle Certified Professional
Senior Consultant
Data Engineering and Administration
Nationwide Investments
(Work) 614-677-1668
(Cell) 614-312-6715
Interested in helping out your marriage?
Ask me about "Weekend to Remember"
Dec 12-14, 2008 here in Columbus.
From:
"John Dunn" <JDunn@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
"Booth.Steve" <Steve.Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
12/16/2008 09:04 AM
Subject:
RE: Alternatives to using utl_file
Sent by:
oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
OK, thanks
The biggest issue I have with utl_file is needing to define utl_file_dir=
Since the directories we need to access are not known till run time we
have to specify utl_file_dir=*, which is a security nightmare.
John
Other related posts:
