Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
- From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: peter.schauss@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:49:52 -0700
On 4/11/07, Schauss, Peter <peter.schauss@xxxxxxx> wrote:
My manager is proposing to cluster two Solaris 5.9 servers in order to
create a "high availability" solution.
I assume that buy putting "high availability" in quotes this
is not really an HA solution.
It will however create more work.
For you.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
- References:
- Active/Passive "high availability"
- From: Schauss, Peter
Other related posts:
- » Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » RE: Active/Passive "high availability"
- » Re: Active/Passive "high availability"
My manager is proposing to cluster two Solaris 5.9 servers in order to create a "high availability" solution.
- Active/Passive "high availability"
- From: Schauss, Peter