Hi Raj, I will share the results when they are available. I currently don't blog, although have pondered about it many times. Just need to find the time to put content on a regular basis that is valuable to others, rather than using it as a "personalized rant platform" :-) Cheers, Gaja Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha, CEO & Founder, DBPerfMan LLC http://www.dbperfman.com http://www.dbcloudman.com Phone - +1-650-743-6060 http://www.linkedin.com/in/gajakrishnavaidyanathaCo-author:Oracle Insights:Tales of the Oak Table - http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID14 Co-author:Oracle Performance Tuning 101 - http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0072131454/ref=sib_dp_pt/102-6130796-4625766 ________________________________ From: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx> To: gajav@xxxxxxxxx; Oracle Discussion List <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 11:04 AM Subject: Re: Active Dataguard -- Cascade Standby or not This would be a good case study Gaja, should we expect a nice blogpost soon ? Raj On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha <gajav@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Hi Stalin, > Currently doing an HA & DR PoC using ADG in the "Cascade Configuration" at > a customer site. Conceptually, we are thinking pretty much on the same > lines as you are and evaluating the use of the first "SYNC STANDBY" (if I > may use that term), as the propagator to the other STANDBYs. This takes the > additional overhead off the PRIMARY and imposes most of the propagation > load on the SYNC STANDBY (reporting instance), yet optimizing the lag for > the other STANDBYs. Will post the results when the PoC is complete and the > results are available. > > -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l