Re: Accuracy with computing UTM from decimal degrees
- From: "Bill Ferguson" <wbfergus@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Ian Cary" <ian.cary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:39:05 -0600
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the reply. This is on an 11.1.0.6 database. When I run the
same query on this version,
select cs_name,srid from mdsys.sdo_cs_srs where cs_name like 'NAD 27%17N%';
I get back 'NAD 27 / UTM zone 17N' and 2032617.
If I change the query to:
select cs_name,srid from mdsys.sdo_cs_srs where srid = 2032614;
Then I recieve 'NAD 27 / UTM zone 14N' and 2032614. So that's at least
interesting to note the differences between the versions, for
something that you'd think would be the same (though maybe some slight
differences within the WKTEXT field). Right off hand, that looks like
something that may bite a bunch of Spatial users in the butt when they
upgrade to this version of Oracle.
The Oracle Forums finally came back up yesterday, and I was finally
able to post the question over there as well, but so far no answers on
there.
I'll give it a few more hours and see if somebody notices any glaring
errors or something else before I try the SR route. It seems like if
this is a real problem with the routines or internal code Oracle uses,
somebody else would have noticed it by now, but who knows? This is
primarily why I'm starting down the path that I coded something wrong
first. I guess I'll also update that post on the forums as well with
this new information, and see if maybe somebody will finally reply.
Thanks again for your reply.
--
-- Bill Ferguson
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: Accuracy with computing UTM from decimal degrees
- From: Ian Cary
Other related posts:
- » Accuracy with computing UTM from decimal degrees
- » Re: Accuracy with computing UTM from decimal degrees
- » Re: Accuracy with computing UTM from decimal degrees
- » Re: Accuracy with computing UTM from decimal degrees
- Re: Accuracy with computing UTM from decimal degrees
- From: Ian Cary