Contact house of brick technologies. They have done quite a bit of work with
oracle audit defense.
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 8, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Michael Cunningham <napacunningham@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello all, we have an Oracle audit going on and we are being told we are
going to get charged for using Active Data Guard.
Has anyone been successful in working with Oracle to have them realize these
were unintentional and not deliberate?
Technically the feature was enabled, but it was by accident and incorrect
configuration of srvctl. As it happens, we had one standby database
configured with db_startoption=open, and the other standby database with
db_startoption=read only.
The first was as a result of requiring a "failover" to physical standby and
we missed setting the db_startoption=mount when we rebuilt the standby on the
server that used to be primary.
Each of the problems have been corrected, but Oracle is working on a bill and
I'm looking for some advice from the group.
--
Michael Cunningham
