RE: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- From: "Khedr, Waleed" <Waleed.Khedr@xxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:39:03 -0400
Data warehouses usually require using PQO, and this uses direct reads
that will benefit nothing of big buffer cache.
Regards,
Waleed
-----Original Message-----
From: Hemant K Chitale [mailto:hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:32 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
At my site we'll be migrating a [currently very small 20GB] Corporate=20
DataWarehouse
from 32-bit 8.1.7 Solaris to 32-bit 9i Linux. It will grow rapidly with
Manufacturing Datamarts
to probably 500GB in a year.
Some of the DataMart teams are pushing for a very large SGA while I
would=20
rather have a
large PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET [not using 10g and Automatic Memory
Management]
My rebuttal was :
We must consider how large we really need the SGA. A too large SGA
[assuming that it is not too large as to cause excessive Paging and
begin=20
Swapping at the OS level]
can result in :
a. Performance impact in Checkpoints -- larger checkpoints, longer
write times for DBWR
b. Performance impact in Free Buffer scans -- longer buffer chains
c. Performance impact on Cache Buffer Chains latch -- more buffers
per
latch means that the latch may be held more frequently
d. Delayed Block Cleanouts -- modified blocks remaining in memory
requiring cleanups and causing potential ORA-1555s
Comments / Recommendations / Corrections from this list, please ?
Hemant K Chitale
Oracle 9i Database Administrator Certified Professional
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital
"A man's reputation is what other people think of him; his character is=20
what he really is."
-- Miner, Jack
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- From: Mladen Gogala
Other related posts:
- » About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- » RE: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- » RE: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- » Re: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- » RE: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- » Re: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- » Re: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- » RE: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- Re: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
- From: Mladen Gogala