Re: ASM of any significant value when switching to Direct NFS / NetApp / non-RAC?
- From: Wayne Smith <wts@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Dana Nibby <dananrg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:29:03 -0400
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Dana Nibby <dananrg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote, in
part:
> ... When you say there is more to ASM than striping, what functionality is
> that?
>
I'm not an ASM expert by any stretch of the imagination, nor do I use it!
But I'll write here a little, anyway :-(
There's been lots written and available on the web on this subject. A
search "why oracle asm" yielded many articles.
ASM seems give one a level of indirection, pretty much removing the
underlying storage complexity and putting storage more in tune with Oracle
tools, concepts and syntax.
I'm not at all surprised that your storage administrators don't want it.
It's foreign to them and different from everything else they do.
Everything about ASM is a complexity to them, I suspect.
Should ASM be a DBA function rather than storage admin function? I don't
know, I'm just asking, but unless you have a lot of databases, I can see
where your typical storage admin would see ASM as a black hole of time and
complexity, whereas the DBA could appreciate its value, albeit a black hole
of time and complexity. ;-)
Cheers, Wayne
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
