RE: ASM - hardware mirroring vs. Oracle mirroring
- From: "Baumgartel, Paul" <paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Don Seiler" <don@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:57:25 -0400
I didn't say that RMAN wasn't supported with ASM. Please read my post
again.
Paul Baumgartel
CREDIT SUISSE
Information Technology
Prime Services Databases Americas
One Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010
USA
Phone 212.538.1143
paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.credit-suisse.com
-----Original Message-----
From: dtseiler@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:dtseiler@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don
Seiler
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:35 PM
To: Baumgartel, Paul
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ASM - hardware mirroring vs. Oracle mirroring
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Baumgartel, Paul
<paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I understand that many people use ASM in conjunction with Symmetrix,
etc.,
> but I don't see how just pooling the storage and presenting it to the
> database is worth the effort (and the limitations, as there are
certain
> operations in, e.g., RMAN, that aren't supported with ASM).
What do you mean RMAN isn't supported with ASM? RMAN is the *only*
backup solution available when you use ASM.
--
Don Seiler
http://seilerwerks.wordpress.com
ultimate: http://www.mufc.us
==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications
disclaimer:
http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html
==============================================================================
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
