Re: ASM - hardware mirroring vs. Oracle mirroring

I used it with 10G and RAC as last assignment, took a little bit to learn 
it but after that I thought it was great.

Joe

---------------------------------------
You can have it: Fast, Right or Cheap, pick 2 of the 3.
Fast + Right is Expensive
Fast + Cheap will be incorrect.
Right + Cheap will take a while.



"Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
 
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




04/16/2008 12:14 PM
Please respond to jkstill@xxxxxxxxx

From
"Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
To
"Finn Jorgensen" <finn.oracledba@xxxxxxxxx>
cc
krish.hariharan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Don 
Seiler" <don@xxxxxxxxx>, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: ASM - hardware mirroring vs. Oracle mirroring






Is it just me, or does ASM unnecessarily complicate operations?

Frankly, things such as this are why I don't use it.

With a halfway decent volume manager, I don't see the need for ASM.

Jared


On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Finn Jorgensen <finn.oracledba@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
Krish, I don't think that's possible when your only means of getting data 
to tape is NetBackup. tar/cpio could not get to the tapes in that 
particular case.
 
Steve, you could say that, but as is so often the case, things started out 
in one way and somewhere down the line circumstances changed necessitating 
the archival and space had already been provisioned and there was no money 
for more disk (hence the archiving in the first place).
 
Finn
...

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

Other related posts: