RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Polarski, Bernard" <Bernard.Polarski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <anjo.kolk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:17:13 -0700
If I understand correctly, session_cached_cursors causes a "softer"
parse, but a parse would still show up as a parse in the 10046 output so
I don't believe this parameter could be responsible for the 50%
reduction in parse count. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks,
Brandon
________________________________
From: Polarski, Bernard [mailto:Bernard.Polarski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 2:37 AM
In the upgrade process, did you changed 'session_cached_cursors'
from 0 (default in 8i) to something like 50+?
In this case your hits are much better and there is less
pression on the shared pool, hence your parsing decrease also.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- From: Bobak, Mark
Other related posts:
- » 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » Re: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- » RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- RE: 9i Parsing Optimization
- From: Bobak, Mark