RE: 9207 in prod
- From: "Connor McDonald" <mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:08:15 +0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> caseydyke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, 14 September 2006 8:53 AM
> To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: fairlie rego
> Subject: 9207 in prod
>
> Folks,
>
> Just trying to get a feel for community comfort w/9207 in
> prod.
I can't comment on 9208 but we've had a number of dramas with 9207 (solaris
32bit single instance), mainly related to
a) shared pool issues (but our app's not a shining example of good shared
pool use)
b) parallel query slaves spinning
c) ora-600's, 7445's on more "leading edge" things (multi-table insert,
merge command)
Another client runs RAC solaris 32bit and I quote: 'moving from 9204 to 9207
was a big mistake' (they're now moving to linux...)
So even unseen, I'd probably recommend you give 9208 a whirl...
Cheers
Connor
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- 9207 in prod
- From: caseydyke
Other related posts:
- » 9207 in prod
- » Re: 9207 in prod
- » RE: 9207 in prod
- » RE: 9207 in prod
- » RE: 9207 in prod
- » RE: 9207 in prod
- » RE: 9207 in prod
- » RE: 9207 in prod
- 9207 in prod
- From: caseydyke