RE: 9207 in prod
- From: "Juan Miranda" <j.miranda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Thomas.Mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <caseydyke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:46:12 +0200
Hi Thomas and list
We have continuos core dumps with 9207 in linux 32 bit.
We update to 9208 and solve the problem.
Wed Aug 16 17:07:28 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_6763.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria [kghlru()+56]
[SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x2
4] [] []
...
Sat Aug 19 10:05:02 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_12304.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria
[kgidlt()+1085] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x4] [] []
...
Tue Aug 22 09:24:13 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_9708.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria [kxsflh()+68]
[SIGSEGV] [Addr
ess not mapped to object] [0x20000010] [] []
...
Thu Aug 24 16:36:03 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_11927.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria [kghfrf()+65]
-----Mensaje original-----
De: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
Enviado el: jueves, 14 de septiembre de 2006 14:36
Para: caseydyke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: fairlie rego
Asunto: RE: 9207 in prod
We are using 9207 in both OLTP and warehouse environs. No problems for
us.
--------------------------------------------------------
This transmission may contain confidential, proprietary, or privileged
information which is intended solely for use by the individual or entity to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying or distribution of this
transmission or its attachments is strictly prohibited. In addition,
unauthorized access to this transmission may violate federal or State law,
including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1985. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the transmission and its attachments.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
caseydyke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:53 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: fairlie rego
Subject: 9207 in prod
Folks,
Just trying to get a feel for community comfort w/9207 in prod. We're
looking to get off 9204 and now have approval to proceed through the
dev/uat/svt and prod envs. I say 9207 as our initial push occurred
prior to the recent (Aug 24th) release of 9208 for our port (Solaris
64bit). The databases house OLTP and DW type apps in the multi-TB
range. Note we're tied to 9iR2 due to vendor support.
We're still early enough in the game to choose 9208 - but 9207 should
likewise be sufficient. We've got anecdotal evidence of "issues"
w/9207, but nothing really concrete. Hence, I would like to see what
the broader community thinks. Good, bad, indifferent ... ??
Any and all input will be greatly appreciated.
Thx,
Casey
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
