Re: 9206 or 9207 on Solaris 64bit?

We had hard time with 9.2.0.6.
After struggling for a while we have decided to leave most of our db-s
on 9.2.0.5 and Skip 9.2.0.6, then migrate directly to 9.2.0.7.
Have migrated a couple of our db-s to 9.2.0.7, so far so good.

In general I would recommend to go to 9.2.0.7.
Even if 9.2.0.7 is as bed as 9.2.0.7 now, 9.2.0.7 would be longer
supported by Oracle.

Jurijs

On 1/9/06, Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Short version:
> Which version are you happy with 9206 or 9207 on Solaris 64bit?
>
> Long version:
> I need to patch to one of these, but I'm having a hard time
> deciding which is going to be less painfilled.  Both of them
> have some ugly known issues published in Note:283899.1 and
> Note:308895.1.
>
> I've tested with both and have not reproduced any of these.
> What has been you experience with these on Solaris 64bit?
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>


--
Jurijs
+44 7738 013090 (GMT)
============================================
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: