Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: John Smiley <jrsmiley@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:43:42 -0600
Because if you have a single, shared ORACLE_HOME, you can't do rolling
upgrades with RAC.
John Smiley
Technical Management Consultant
TUSC, Inc.
On 6/21/05, Pete Sharman <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nope, sorry, this is determined by whether the ***OS*** (i.e. not the
> database) supports a clustered file system or not. I suspect this is
> something you already know, since you sell one. :)
>
> Sorry, couldn't resist.
>
> Seriously, where a CFS is supported by the OS, why would you do anything
> else for the ORACLE_HOME?
>
>
> Pete
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Mladen Gogala
- References:
- RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Kevin Closson
- RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Pete Sharman
Other related posts:
- » 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Mladen Gogala
- RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Kevin Closson
- RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Pete Sharman