RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- To: <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:47:33 +0200
Kevin,
I don't know for the others... but I'd like to keep reading this thread
and how it is evolving.
The discussion is interesting.
Fabrizio
>
> Mladen,
>
> Please side-bar with me. I'll cover your questions.
> I don't want to get spanked for spam if this thread
> grows tiring to others...
>
> I'll answer your questions under separate cover,
> but the short answer is DLM and lock caching. Remember
> that the processing which is causing concern for you
> (fork,exec/map text and demand paging) is base
> functionality for a filesystem....and as I stated
> in my last post, unless a given technology can
> perform basic FS func, don't call it an FS at
> all, more less a CFS.
>
> Heaven's sake, we'd never call /etc/passwd
> a database now, would we? :-)
>
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Paul Vallee
Other related posts:
- » 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- » RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)
- From: Paul Vallee