Re: 32-but oracle versus 64-bit on Oracle
- From: Martic Zoran <zoran_martic@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: JBECKSTROM@xxxxxxxxx, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
--- Jeffrey Beckstrom <JBECKSTROM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am trying to justify
> the move to 64-bit and need something to cancel out
> the higher hardware
> costs.
The only good reason I am seeing is that your database
needs very large data cache, that 32 bit cannot cover,
so speeding up the applications by having much more
data cached.
In global 64-bit applications are slower then 32-bit.
I know this is not the rule, but if no crazy
mathematics is involved or no need for huge cache or
bigger HW that is only 64-bit no reasons to go from
32-bit Oracle.
As I said the other reason may be the application side
and not Oracle at all.
Regards,
Zoran
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
