Re: 32K block size tablespace for indexes
- From: Andy Rivenes <rivenes1@xxxxxxxx>
- To: hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx,oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:06:29 -0800
Another reason is that a single index entry must fit within a single
block. The 11g documentation states:
"The maximum size of a single index entry is approximately one-half
the data block size."
I didn't think that it was that low, but it's been a while since I've
run into this issue.
At 11:03 PM 1/28/2009, hrishy wrote:
Hi
I have inherited a database where the indexes alone are in the 32k
block tablespaces.
Now without any documentation or anything for a hint i am just
wundering why did the original designers design it like that?
What are the pro's and cons of such a approach ?
regards
Hrishy
--
http:// www. freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts: