Re: 2GB or not 2GB (datafile limit)? That is the question.

I'm running mine up to 32GB with no issues. (Well other than we keep
running out of space for 32GB files) ;)
Mainly it's a question of managing the large files at the OS level.
With most current OS's that's not an issue either.  GO BIG.

Jesse, Rich wrote:
> Many moons ago, way back in the 32-bit era when Y2K was a looming
> nightmare, I had instituted a policy that no Oracle datafile would be
> setup to grow larger than 2GB.  This was due to some known bugs with
> files larger than 2GB on many platforms/filesystems at the time.
> 
> As I'm now looking at a vendor's ERP installation, I was about to reduce
> their max datafile size from 32GB to 2GB when I asked myself "Why?".  Is
> there any valid sane reason to do this anymore?  I do not expect the DB
> size to grow beyond a modest 100GB in the next two years.  The server is
> an IBM P5 blade running AIX5.3 and using JFS filesystems.  Other similar
> servers with other DBs (e.g. Sybase) currently handle db files in the
> 100's of GB with no problem.
> 
> I don't see any need to limit the datafile size to 2GB anymore.  Anyone
> else?
> 
> TIA,
> Rich
> --

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: