Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: "Greg Rahn" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Bobak, Mark" <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:04:33 -0700
To quote the notice: "This means customers can no longer keep their
datafiles, OCR or Voting disks on raw devices in Oracle 12g."
What this means that the Oracle database will not support any file on
a raw device *directly*. There will have to be a layer between the
raw device and the database (ASM, filesystem, etc).
I think this is a good, forward looking desupport notice. Given the
pace that I have seen the significant number of customers adopt new
releases for existing production systems, it will be probably be 8
years before 12G is widely common. I base that number on the fact
that 10g came out in 2004, and many large shops are just upgrading to
10gR2 in 2008, 4 years later. Since 11g was released second half of
2007, add 4 years for 11gR2 (or whatever R release) to be main stream
and another 4 years for 12gR? to be main stream. By my estimate we re
talking 2015+/- time frame. Now obviously green field installs will
follow a faster adoption rate, but that is also the case today.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And I forgot the second part of my posting.....so, as people move from RAW to
> ASM, they're still going to use RAW volumes to allocate storage to ASM,
> right? Seems to me it would be pretty silly to put filesystems on all your
> storage, just so you can hand it over to ASM.
>
> So, seems to me, Oracle will still deal w/ raw, albeit perhaps only through
> the ASM path....?
--
Regards,
Greg Rahn
http://structureddata.org
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Yavor Ivanov
- References:
- 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Hemant K Chitale
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Matthew Zito
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bradd Piontek
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: jason arneil
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bradd Piontek
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Andrew Kerber
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Dan Norris
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Greg Rahn
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bobak, Mark
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bobak, Mark
Other related posts:
- » 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- » Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Yavor Ivanov
- 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Hemant K Chitale
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Matthew Zito
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bradd Piontek
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: jason arneil
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bradd Piontek
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Andrew Kerber
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Dan Norris
- Re: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Greg Rahn
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bobak, Mark
- RE: 12G Desupport for Raw Devices
- From: Bobak, Mark