thanks, like I said, I've been trying to ignore it, so I did not recognise the reference. On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:47:09AM -0500, Don Seiler wrote: > I believe Greg meant OEL5-U3. OEL3 would be painful. > > Don. > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Ray Stell<stellr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:51:08AM -0700, Greg Rahn wrote: > >> RH5/OEL5 certainly works and I would recommend it over RH4. ?I'm using > >> OELU3. > > > > OEL3 with which db? > > > > I'd been trying to ignore the Oracle linux effort, just because we have > > such large RH base. ?Probably can't get away with that much longer, heh? > > Curious, does 11g choke on OEL4? ?When I say choke, I mean do you have > > to jump through hoops to make it go together. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > > > > > > > > -- > Don Seiler > http://seilerwerks.wordpress.com > ultimate: http://www.mufc.us -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l