Re: 11g 64 bit and Red Hat 4

  • From: Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Don Seiler <don@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:51:55 -0400

thanks, like I said, I've been trying to ignore it, so I did not
recognise the reference.




On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:47:09AM -0500, Don Seiler wrote:
> I believe Greg meant OEL5-U3.  OEL3 would be painful.
> 
> Don.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Ray Stell<stellr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:51:08AM -0700, Greg Rahn wrote:
> >> RH5/OEL5 certainly works and I would recommend it over RH4. ?I'm using 
> >> OELU3.
> >
> > OEL3 with which db?
> >
> > I'd been trying to ignore the Oracle linux effort, just because we have
> > such large RH base. ?Probably can't get away with that much longer, heh?
> > Curious, does 11g choke on OEL4? ?When I say choke, I mean do you have
> > to jump through hoops to make it go together.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Don Seiler
> http://seilerwerks.wordpress.com
> ultimate: http://www.mufc.us
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: