Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- From: "Alex Gorbachev" <gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 02:35:39 -0500
For us mortals - why would one need, let's say, CREATE SEQUENCE to
connect to database? Was it impossible in Oracle 5 or earlier to
connect without creating a sequence?
I assume CONNECT role was just given wrong name not reflecting its purpose.
On 11/1/06, jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's for backwards compatibility with
Oracle 5 (or possibly earlier)
gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Absolutely correct. But who'd got that bright idea to make CONNECT
> role setup in that way until and including 10.2.0.1? There must be
> some explanation. :)
>
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
--
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev
The Pythian Group
Sr. Oracle DBA
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex/
http://blog.oracloid.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- From: jonathan
Other related posts:
- » 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- » Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
It's for backwards compatibility with Oracle 5 (or possibly earlier) gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Absolutely correct. But who'd got that bright idea to make CONNECT > role setup in that way until and including 10.2.0.1? There must be > some explanation. :) > Regards Jonathan Lewis
- Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- Re: 10gR2, problem about Resource role
- From: jonathan