RE: 10g ADDM: Threat to DBAs?

  • From: "Johnson, George" <GJohnson@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:24:55 -0000

 
            This guy wasn't to impressed by the new auto-tuning toys.
 
            http://www.dbspecialists.com/presentations/case_study_10g.html 
<http://www.dbspecialists.com/presentations/case_study_10g.html> 
 
            Not saying they won't go eventually, but as the man said "don't 
hold your breath". The first person to invent the perfect tuning software for 
databases, will basically be able to buy Microsoft and Oracle out of loose 
change! 
 
            
 
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Bobak, Mark
Sent: 04 Mar 2006 23:12
To: lambu999@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l
Subject: RE: 10g ADDM: Threat to DBAs?



        Hehe....I wouldn't hold your breath.....;-)
         
        Tom Kyte did a nice job answering this one, here:
        
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:14039738984108
         
        -Mark
         

        -- 
        Mark J. Bobak 
        Senior Oracle Architect 
        ProQuest Information & Learning 

        "Exception:  Some dividends may be reported as qualified dividends but 
are not qualified dividends.  These include: 

        * Dividends you received on any share of stock that you held for less 
than 61 days during the 121-day period that began 60 days before the 
ex-dividend date.  The ex-dividend date is the first date following the 
declaration of a dividend on which the purchaser of a stock is not entitled to 
receive the next dividend payment. When counting the number of days you held 
the stock, include the day you disposed of the stock but not the day you 
acquired it. See the examples below. Also, when counting the number of days you 
held the stock, you cannot count certain days during which your risk of loss 
was diminished.  See Pub. 550 for more details."

          --IRS, Form 1040-A Instruction Booklet, Line 9b:  Qualified Dividends 

         

________________________________

        From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ram K
        Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 6:05 PM
        To: oracle-l
        Subject: 10g ADDM: Threat to DBAs?
        
        
        Hello gurus,
           
        I searched on this list for ADDM. I did not find the answer on this 
topic.       
        Are ADDM and its successors going to put DBAs out of jobs? or reduce 
the number of DBAs required? I read about it online in one site that the 
dependency on DBAs for tuning might end soon. 
           
        -- 
        Thanks,
        Ram. 



****************************************************************************
This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual or entity named.  If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received 
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is 
regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************

Other related posts: