[opendtv] Re: Why Europe should choose 720P for HDTV

The filters were designed before pixellated displays were common. There was
always the assumption that the image would have the "defocusing" effect of
the crt spot. I believe that this is why compression artefacts look worse on
pixellated displays, they have no post-filter. A simple layer of light
diffuser would fix it. The big JVC projectors effectively do that, and the
pictures look better.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Barry" <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 5:39 PM
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Why Europe should choose 720P for HDTV


> Alan -
>
> But does that 42% amount account for the fact that fixed pixel displays
> may be effectively tiny little squares with sharply defined edges?  Or
> is it intend for some CRT spot beam with approx Gaussian distribution?
>
> Or does it matter?
>
> BTW, It's been pointed out here on the list that my concerns about this
> possible non-problem could easily be fixed anyway by simple blurring the
> fixed pixels a bit as displayed.  This could even more easily be done
> optically in projectors like DLP's and I suspect many digital movie
> theaters would look slightly better when very slightly out of focus if
> the owners were not so proud of their ability to display non-Nyquist
> graphics images (or concerned they hadn't waited for higher rez).
>
> Comments?
>
> - Tom
>
>
> Alan Roberts wrote:
>
> > The Nyquist limit is exactly 50% of the sampling frequency, you have to
> > filter to lower that this to get smooth motion. Typically, digital
systems
> > have analogue filters to prevent frequencies above 0.45 of sampling
> > frequencies getting into the system. The ITU recommended filters for 601
and
> > 709 sampling are both flat to 42%, then dive steeply to -12dB at 50%,
> > allowing some aliases to creep in. Conventional wisdom is that this is a
> > good idea, I don't go along with it fully because those aliases cause
havoc
> > in compressors, even at low levels.
> >
> > So, you need 20 pixels to show 18 lines or 9 cycles. The filtering
refuses
> > to allow such frequencies to start/stop suddenly, so you get confusion
at
> > the ends of a block of such frequencies, but it all looks fine once the
edge
> > effects have passed. It's interesting to work out the actual pixel
pattern
> > for such frequencies, and to see what happens when it all moves, I've
done
> > so and the results are fascinating, it explains why aliases are such a
bad
> > idea.
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Tom Barry" <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 4:32 PM
> > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Why Europe should choose 720P for HDTV
> >
> >
> >
> >>Mark -
> >>
> >>How much do you have to filter so that an image can move smoothly across
> >>or down a fixed pixel display 1/2 pixel at a time without aperture
> >>effect artifacts.  Is it just to the Nyquist limit, or more?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> >
> > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
> >
> > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
> >
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
>


 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: