Or they could have just asked the manufacturer. Or maybe read the emails or cracked the manual, made a phone call or scratched their heads. IMO they knew exactly what they were doing and their silence since is all the testimony needed. Bob Miller John Golitsis wrote: >What can you provide that shows that the CRC was the group that >selected which receiver(s) would be used for the field tests? To me, >this sounds well beyond what the CRC's mandate would generally be, >which is TESTING. They may have made recommendations, or perhaps >recommendations were assumed from the test results, but did they >actually SELECT the receiver model to be used?? > >The CRC would have been hired (or utilized) to put receivers through >a battery of tests. Who determined what would be included in the >suite of tests? What test would have showed the open front-end of >this unit? Was a test like that part of the suite? If not, why? Is >it a test that would normally be applied? Was it specifically left out? > >On 16-Dec-05, at 10:36 AM, John Shutt wrote: > > > >>John, talk about rehashing old arguments! The CRC lab tested >>several DVB-T >>receivers from several vendors, and based solely on their testing >>chose the >>BT DVTM 2000T receiver as the only COFDM receiver to test. >> >> >> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > >- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >FreeLists.org > >- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.