[opendtv] Re: The wilderness is becoming plain
- From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:17:00 -0400
At 5:49 PM -0400 6/20/06, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
>John Shutt wrote:
>
>> There is probably a 1% penetration of battery portable
>> "watchman" type NTSC receivers, yet there is a large
>> enough market to continue to sell these miniscule
>> receivers to the public year after year. I have
>> always stated that if our digital signal, without
>> modification, could be received portably and without
>> subscription, then there would be a larger market for
>> the service.
>
>The biggest problem now, be it high quality digital audio or high
>quality digital video, is that high data rate digital electronics draw
>quite a bit of power. While it is possible to provide the juice, via
>lap-top PC sort of ~2 hour rechargeable batteries, that's not exactly
>the equivalent of analog receivers of this type.
Bert is correct that power requirements are a major consideration,
especially as the size of the receiver decreases. I have little doubt
that there will be a market for the delivery of video to cellular
phones, but I have never considered this to be the real target.
There are several devices and venues that can take advantage of
portability and mobility, and for the most part they are not as
severely constrained as a tiny cellphone.
IMHO, the largest potential venue is portable computers; these
devices have relative large, high resolution screens and enough
battery power to get you from the house to the office. Broadcasting
IP data, audio and video to portable computers is a no-brainer.
The next largest potential market is built in car theater systems.
Here, battery power is not an issue, and the screen size can range
from adequate to near HD. I've seen SUVs equipped with 32" and larger
LCD or Plasma displays that reside in the cargo area and flip down
for those all important tail gate parties.
And then we have purpose built portable video systems; the first
generation of portable DVD players serve as a good example, while the
Video iPOD serves as a more questionable new entrant. It is important
to remember that Apple's venture into video via the iTunes music
store is NOT primarily targeted at the video iPOD; and it is also
important to keep in mind that the Video iPOD can be connected to any
NTSC display, producing an image that approaches NTSC quality. The
real target for iTunes video is the PC that is used to download and
manage your digital media content. Most of the music videos
downloaded from Apple, Google, and Yahoo are viewed on large, high
resolution PC screens. The ability to take your video with you via an
iPOD or portable computer is the added hook.
All of this suggests that there are many applications for receiving
FTA DTV broadcasts, when the modulation system is tuned for
portable/mobile reception.
>Largely for that reason, completely different digital standards are
>being peddled for the small portable. The other reason is robustness of
>the signal, and the way the digital cliff makes that more of a problem
>than in analog.
This varies considerably in different parts of the world. Since the
ATSC standard is useless for portable/mobile reception, it is
completely understandable that different standards are emerging for
this application. In Europe, it is quite feasible to segment the
available spectrum for different applications using a SINGLE standard
- you simply tune the modulation characteristics for the desired
application. The situation in Japan is similar.
And there is the reality that multiple industries are testing the
water with mobile video. The Cellular industry has been the most
aggressive, broadcasters the least aggressive. The main reason for
this - IMHO - is that the telco types have an integrated transaction
system and customers who have been trained to pay for every service.
Broadcasters could care less about a tiny niche market that can only
be monetized with advertising revenues.
>
>I agree that we need a portable-friendly solution for regular digital
>radio and regular DTT signals. Completely agree.
Something Bert and I can agree on !
;-)
It remains to be seen if ATSC will ever become portable friendly.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: The wilderness is becoming plain
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] The wilderness is becoming plain
- » [opendtv] Re: The wilderness is becoming plain
- » [opendtv] Re: The wilderness is becoming plain
- » [opendtv] Re: The wilderness is becoming plain
- [opendtv] Re: The wilderness is becoming plain
- From: Manfredi, Albert E