[opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:31:46 -0400
At 10:34 PM +0200 10/27/04, Olivier Houot wrote:
>Recently, I saw a demo of a 1280x720 LCD front projector.
>
>The picture was approximately 2 meters wide (with a cinema aspect
>ratio), and it was not an impressive size at all, i found it wanting
>from this point of view.
>I would certainly feel frustrated if after putting money in a costly
>HDTV setup, i could not get more than that size out of it.
What kind of room do you have for a larger screen?
Based on your description I calculate the following about the display
you were watching (I am converting to inches to take advantage of a
cheat sheet that I use).
This assumes that the projector is 1280 x 720 and that the image is 2
meters wide (~78 inches).
Thus for a full 16:9 raster, the screen height would be 44 inches,
and the screen diagonal `90 inches. Based on this info alone, I can
understand why you perceived what you did.
I have often used the following rule of thumb to determine the raster
resolution needed for various screen sizes at preferred viewing
distances.
Screens up to 40 inch diagonal - 480P is sufficient - Preferred
viewing distance ~7 picture heights
Screens between 40 to 100 inch diagonal - 720P is sufficient -
Preferred viewing distance ~5 picture heights
Screens larger than 100 inch diagonal - 1080 lines are needed -
Preferred viewing distance ~ 3-4 picture heights
The preferred viewing distance is the location that the average
observer would choose to sit from the display when given the option
to choose a comfortable viewing distance. Several studies have shown
that the distance (as measured in multiples of the screen height)
decreases as the screen size increases. The average viewer does not
choose to sit 3.3 picture heights from the screen until it is about
117 inch diagonal - a distance of about 17 feet, which is not
feasible in most family rooms.
The preferred viewing distance for typical HDTV displays (40-60
inches is about five picture heights).
>The corner of the store where the display was did not allow me to get as
>far as the screen as i would have liked, yet a rough measurement with my
>steps suggested a distance on the order of 3.5 to 4 meters.
So your viewing distance was about 12-13 feet, or right at 3.3 picture heights.
It is not surprising that you saw the good old LCD screen door effect
at this viewing distance. You should have.
Unfortunatley, LCD light valves suffer from the manufacturing reality
that the signal traces must be run between the LCD sample sites. As
the image is magnified by increasing its size, eventually you will
see these fine lines between the samples. The solution is simple,
increase the viewing distance or reduce the projected image size.
Your example places the display conditions near the transition point
where 1080 lines is beneficial.
I strongly suspect that if the projector had used DLP technology
rather than LCD, you would not have detected the raster. The reason
is that seams between the samples are much smaller, as the
micromirrors nearly touch one another.
>In those conditions, the pixels of the LCD matrix were just at the limit
>of visibility, on the bad side of the limit, meaning i could see them.
>So to me, 1280x720 is not enough.
Exactly as they should be, although without the LCD screendoor, it is
unlikely that you would have seen the actual pixels. That is, you
would be just on the good side of the limit.
>
>Some recent european reports consider that 720 is enough for 130 cm
>screens (diagonal), but that beyond that, 1080 should be considered.
>After that (far from scientific) experience, i am tempted to concur .
I would like to see these studies. I think there may be some serious
errors in their observations, based on the limits of the human visual
system.
a 130 (51") cm screen is near the low end of the range of screen
sizes for 720P. I have seen 72 inch DLP displays with 720P resolution
that can easily be viewed at 3 picture heights without the perception
of the raster ( not that i would choose to sit that close).
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- From: John Golitsis
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- From: Olivier Houot
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- » [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- From: John Golitsis
- [opendtv] Re: State of the Art LCD 45" HDTV
- From: Olivier Houot