You seem to be misreading again. There is no point I can see where the
third bar (1080i) was higher than the second (720p). At very high data
rates, the first bar (1080p) did better than the second, but the third was
never better than the second.
TTFN,
Mark
John Shutt wrote:
Mark,
Do you have an explanation as to why uncompressed 1080p50, downconverted
to uncompressed 1080i25, then upconverted back to 1080p50 again at the
display was preferred over 1080p50>720p50>1080p50?
Was there perhaps a Nyquist filtering added at the 1080i conversion stage
that killed resolution for the subsequent upconvert?
John
