Charles Rhodes concluded his recent article "Seeing Ghosts on a Single Frequency Network" with the following comment: "Let's hope the FCC doesn't mandate SFN topology for U.S. broadcasters." Bert commented that a combination of matched filtering in the tuner, tracking tuners, dual conversion IF stages, and good equalizers, can result in very good performance. He added that a more clever use of the rapid symbol arrival times, to improve on dynamic echo equalization, the use of dual receive antennas, and the better combined use of the Reed-Solomon and Viterbi trellis codes, might further improve 8-VSB as currently standardized. IMO, these comments have validity. However, the problem with SFNs for 8-VSB transmitters concerns more than just the capabilities of 8-VSB receivers to receive from one individual 8-VSB transmitter. The crux of the problem is how the 8-VSB receiver combines the signals from a pair of 8-VSB transmitters using identical (or complementary) modulation. The SFN proponents originally contemplated combining the signals at the antenna of a single 8-VSB receiver. This can result in as much as a 3 db improvement in SNR of the combined received signals if they be in phase. However, combining the signals at the antenna of a single 8-VSB receiver is also apt to cause catastrophic loss of reception should the received signals be in anti-phase. If the 8-VSB signals from a pair of 8-VSB transmitters using identical baseband modulating signal are to be constructively combined irrespective of the siting of the 8-VSB receiver, the 8-VSB signals must be kept separate from each other until the conversion to baseband where both signals have in effect been de-rotated to a common phase. The two baseband signals can then be combined, either in a critically sampled digital regime or in an over-sampled digital regime that is quasi-analog in nature. The easiest way to maintain separation is for the pair of 8-VSB transmitters using identical baseband modulating signal to transmit over different RF channels. A pair of tuners convert respective ones of the RF signals each to baseband to de-rotate both the identical baseband modulating signal to a common phase. Then the baseband signals can be constructively combined Suppose the 8-VSB RF signals resulting from identical baseband modulating signals are transmitted at alternate times from a pair of 8-VSB transmitters that transmit with no more than 50% duty cycles using the same RF channel allocation. Then, the 8-VSB signals have been converted to baseband, they can be differentially delayed and subsequently constructively combined. Note that, overall, this is no more spectrally efficient than the frequency-diversity transmissions using two RF channels. Half as many RF channels are used, but digital bandwidth is halved owing to the 50% duty cycles. The proponents of SFNs for 8-VSB signals seek to transmit respective 8-VSB RF signals resulting from identical baseband modulating signals from a pair of 8-VSB transmitters that transmit with 100% duty cycles using the same RF channel allocation. It appears that the proponents of SFNs for 8-VSB signals now contemplate keeping the respective 8-VSB RF signals separate from each other by directional antennas or by different antenna polarization. The practical problem with this is that such antenna systems are difficult to graft onto handheld 8-VSB receivers. The strain on one's wrist to cart around a receiver with such antenna is something to consider. Fifty years from now old-timers will have arthritis in their wrists besides in their thumbs. Networks of 8-VSB transmitters with overlapping coverage areas would better transmit at different carrier frequencies, rather than a single carrier frequency. Not only has most of the investment in transmission antennas for frequency-diversity transmissions already been sunk and amortized, handheld 8-VSB receivers can use single antennas of practical size. Al ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.