[opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- From: "Bob Miller" <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:32:27 -0400
I checked it out. They have 16 repeaters for Manhattan alone and more
than 40 for the city. Using 700 MHz you could do a great job with 4
or 5 for the city and 10 for the greater NYC area IMO.
Always said that XM was a terrestrial radio company using their
satellites as a device to get by the NAB.
Bob Miller
On 9/24/07, Bob Miller <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't think that XMRadio is using 91 repeaters for NYC, more like
> New York State. Probably 25 to 30 for NYC and that is the greater NYC
> which could include all of Long Island (120 miles Long) lots of New
> Jersy and parts of Connecicut etc.
>
> And they are operating at 2300 MHz which is not so sweet as 700 MHz is
> for Qualcomm. Qualcomm probably covers NYC with one transmitter or a
> couple at best today with their COFDM based MediaFlo.
>
> Bob Miller
>
> On 9/22/07, Albert Manfredi <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > What I found interesting in this piece was that in addition to its
> > satellite transmitters, XM Radio needs, for example, 91 "small sticks" to
> > cover NYC, and 39 small sticks to cover LA. Furthermore, that at least some
> > of these "small sticks" are tall. They mention one example of a sanctioned
> > 490' antenna height turning out to have been 900' in fact. I don't know how
> > many of their small sticks are that tall. Seems to me that many were, they
> > would be more obvious. Perhaps they are sharing TV towers in some cases?
> >
> > The article talks about power level and location violations, without
> > mentioning what the power levels are.
> >
> > Apparenty, Sirius, with 3 ellyptical orbit satellites, depends less on
> > terrestrial repeaters than XM, with two satellites in geosynchronous orbits.
> >
> > The NAB is against the possible merger of these two companies. Best I can
> > tell, the NAB's concern is that such a monopoly would have so much content
> > buying power that local stations would be shut out of competition. Although
> > the NAB also makes arguments which I find puzzling. For example, that such
> > a merger would reduce innovation and increase prices for satellite radio.
> > Probably true, but it sounds to me like that would work to the NAB's
> > advantage.
> >
> > (NAB positions at http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home)
> >
> > Bert
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=azdBm8rw6BmU&refer=news
> >
> > XM's Rogue Antennas Amplify Signals, Merger Scrutiny (Update2)
> >
> > By Christopher Stern
> >
> > April 24 (Bloomberg) -- XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. became the
> > nation's largest satellite broadcaster with a network of hundreds of
> > antennas that were built and operated in violation of U.S. Federal
> > Communications Commission rules.
> >
> > At least a third of the 800 antennas that beam XM's radio channels to
> > millions of customers were placed in unapproved locations or emitted
> > signals that were too strong, according to a review of FCC filings. XM says
> > some now comply with the rules, though it doesn't know how many.
> >
> > The misplaced antennas may result in fines or a shutdown of part of the
> > company's network. Lawmakers including U.S. Representative Edward Markey
> > say regulators should take the violations into account when they consider
> > XM's plan to combine with Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.
> >
> > ``This series of apparent violations by XM does provide fuel to opponents
> > of the merger and gives them reason to think they can get the deal
> > rejected,'' said Paul Gallant, a Washington-based policy analyst with
> > Stanford Washington Research.
> >
> > Sirius and XM need approval from the FCC and Justice Department for their
> > all-stock combination, worth $3.42 billion at today's closing prices.
> >
> > The extent of the breach hasn't been widely disclosed by XM. The company
> > told shareholders on Feb. 22 in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing
> > that ``certain'' antennas had unapproved locations or power without giving
> > further details, and said that the FCC had begun an investigation.
> >
> > `Administrative Problems'
> >
> > XM Chief Executive Officer Hugh Panero told investors on a Feb. 26
> > conference call that while ``clearly there were mistakes or administrative
> > problems,'' the FCC isn't likely to force the company to make changes that
> > would affect customers. The company is ``just working with'' the FCC to
> > find a solution, Panero said.
> >
> > ``XM voluntarily disclosed these variances to the FCC, took unilateral
> > action to eliminate many of them, and continues to work directly with the
> > FCC to address any concerns,'' XM spokesman Chance Patterson said. The
> > differences between the approved and actual locations or signal strength
> > are ``generally immaterial,'' he said.
> >
> > XM depends more on its ground-based network than Sirius, whose satellites
> > give better coverage. Sirius Chief Executive Officer Mel Karmazin told
> > Congress last week that 11 of the company's 138 antennas violated rules and
> > that he switched them off in October.
> >
> > Four Hearings
> >
> > Lawmakers have no direct authority to block the merger, though they might
> > influence the outcome by making their feelings known. Congress has held
> > four hearings on the proposed combination at which legislators raised
> > concerns over issues including XM's violation of FCC rules.
> >
> > Shares of XM fell 20 cents to $10.93 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq
> > Stock Market trading. They've dropped 22 percent since the purchase by
> > Sirius was announced.
> >
> > Sirius shares were down 3 cents at $2.77 and are down 25 percent since the
> > announcement.
> >
> > The two companies ran afoul of the FCC last year, when the agency said they
> > were selling radios with signals that were too strong. Sirius and XM pulled
> > the radios off the market temporarily while they were fixed.
> >
> > XM uses antennas, or repeaters, to boost signals where buildings or hills
> > block reception from orbiting satellites. The unapproved repeaters are
> > dotted throughout 59 markets including Los Angeles, New York and Chicago,
> > Washington-based XM said in an FCC filing in January.
> >
> > 42 Percent
> >
> > In the filing, XM said the antennas in violation serve 42 percent of its
> > network. In Los Angeles, 23 of XM's 39 antennas are in breach of the rules,
> > the company said. In New York, 35 of 91 are.
> >
> > XM said in December filings that turning off Los Angeles repeaters would
> > have a ``drastic and adverse impact'' on reception and a New York shutdown
> > ``would devastate'' service.
> >
> > Some antennas were erected thousands of feet from their approved location,
> > said XM, which has 7.5 million subscribers. In Chicago, an antenna was more
> > than 11 miles from the authorized spot. In Austin, Texas, a repeater
> > sanctioned for a height of 490 feet was 900 feet high.
> >
> > Consumer groups including the Consumers Union and the National Association
> > of Broadcasters, the trade group for broadcasters that provide free radio,
> > said the violations show why the companies shouldn't be allowed to combine.
> >
> > ``Given their repeated lack of candor in dealing with the FCC, it is
> > astonishing that XM and Sirius would now seek a government-sanctioned
> > monopoly,'' said Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the broadcasters' group. FCC
> > spokesman David Fiske declined to comment.
> >
> > Raising Doubt
> >
> > XM's failure to follow FCC rules indicates it may not live up to Karmazin's
> > promises that the combined company will offer consumers more choice and
> > lower prices, said Markey, who chairs the House Telecommunications and
> > Internet Subcommittee.
> >
> > ``What is the expectation it will follow through or fulfill any public
> > interest conditions?'' Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, said in an
> > e-mailed statement.
> >
> > XM committed the violations as it raced against Sirius to begin service in
> > 2001 and sign up customers. The two have racked up combined losses of more
> > than $6.4 billion in five years as they built their networks. Annual sales
> > at XM grew from $20 million to $933 million in four years. Sirius had
> > revenue of $637 million.
> >
> > The companies say the merger won't stifle competition because of the
> > availability of alternative providers of entertainment and information such
> > as Apple Inc.'s iPod as well as high-definition and traditional radio.
> >
> > To contact the reporter on this story: Christopher Stern at and
> > cstern3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Last Updated: April 24, 2007 16:27 EDT
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > More photos; more messages; more whatever – Get MORE with Windows Live™
> > Hotmail(r). NOW with 5GB storage.
> > http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_5G_0907
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> >
> > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> > FreeLists.org
> >
> > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> > unsubscribe in the subject line.
> >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- From: John Shutt
- References:
- [opendtv] Satellite radio
- From: Albert Manfredi
- [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- From: Bob Miller
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- » [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- From: John Shutt
- [opendtv] Satellite radio
- From: Albert Manfredi
- [opendtv] Re: Satellite radio
- From: Bob Miller