[opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:54:14 -0500
At 11:28 AM -0500 12/15/07, Tom Barry wrote:
I guess one way to look at the a la carte pricing issue is to assume
that any channel already on the Lifeline (limited basic analog AND
clear QAM digital) channel is already in a tier priced so low as to
be considered free, at least when bundled with other services like
broadband. And any channel in that tier is very extremely likely to
stay there. None of them will suddenly start costing any different
under a la carte.
It is the large expensive premium packages that should be unbundled.
I wish proponents of a la carte would make that more clear. The
Lifeline package is fine now, as currently regulated.
Two problems:
1. Some of the channels in the lifeline service are now charging
subscriber fees, thanks to retransmission consent.
2. It is likely that the extended basic subscribers are going to
subsidize these subscriber fees, just as they have been subsidizing
this tier all along (the cable companies must negotiate the price of
this service as part of their franchise agreement, and the industry
claims to be losing money on this tier).
So it is difficult to predict what might happen under ala carte.
Given the historic ambitions of the broadcasters, I am certain that
they would get Congress to "require" the delivery of all broadcast
signals under any ala carte system. In other words, you would NOT be
able to opt out of the broadcast channels - the politicians must
maintain the ability to reach 100% of the citizens!
So while it might not cost more for the lifeline tier, everyone will
be forced to pay the broadcasters the fees that they demand via
retransmission consent.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Tom Barry
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Craig Birkmaier
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Tom Barry
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- » [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
It is the large expensive premium packages that should be unbundled. I wish proponents of a la carte would make that more clear. The Lifeline package is fine now, as currently regulated.
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Tom Barry
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Craig Birkmaier
- [opendtv] Re: Pro a la carte, Another Perspective
- From: Tom Barry