My bet is, we'll be hearing a lot more stories like this one. Mostly, because I can't understand why CO2 is getting so much publicity. If you look this stuff up, you'll find that human contribution to overall CO2 emissions is tiny, compared with what nature dumps into the atmosphere. Maybe 3 percent. And that when combined with water vapor, which is also a much more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2, the effect of human contribution of CO2 plus H2O vapor is even more minuscule. Well under 1 percent. Does that suggest that curbing human production of CO2 will solve global warming? Not to me. If human activity truly is creating, or exacerbating, global warming, wouldn't it be nice to know why? Instead of going into this anti-CO2 frenzy? I'll bet that NF3 is just the tip of the iceberg. There's an inconvenient truth for you. Bert --------------------------------------------- Researchers uncover potent greenhouse gas Gina Roos (10/24/2008 2:54 PM EDT) URL: http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=211600500 A greenhouse gas, nitrogen trifluoride or NF3, is at least four times more prevalent in the atmosphere than previously estimated, according to new research at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego. NF3 is used in the manufacture of liquid crystal flat-panel displays, thin-film photovoltaic cells and microcircuits. Using new analytical techniques, a team of researchers led by Scripps geochemistry professor Ray Weiss made the first atmospheric measurements of NF3, which is said to be thousands of times more effective at warming the atmosphere than an equal mass of carbon dioxide. The amount of the gas in the atmosphere, which could not be detected using previous techniques, had been estimated at less than 1,200 metric tons in 2006. The new research shows the actual amount was 4,200 metric tons. In 2008, about 5,400 metric tons of the gas was in the atmosphere, a quantity that is increasing at about 11 percent per year, according to the report. The research will be published Oct. 31 in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union (AGU). Co-authors of the paper are Scripps researchers Jens Muhle, Peter Salameh and Christina Harth. The research now indicates the gas is 17,000 times more potent as a global warming agent than a similar mass of carbon dioxide, and survives in the atmosphere about five times longer than carbon dioxide. Current NF3 emissions, however, contribute only about 0.15 percent of the total global warming effect contributed by current human-produced carbon dioxide emissions, according to the study. Initially, emissions of NF3 were thought to be so low that it was not covered by the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions signed by 182 countries. In response to the growing use of the gas and concerns that its emissions are not well known, scientists have recently recommended adding it to the list of greenhouse gases regulated by Kyoto. The Scripps team analyzed samples from coastal clean-air stations in California and Tasmania for this research. The researchers found concentrations of the gas rose from about 0.02 parts per trillion in 1978 to 0.454 parts per trillion in 2008. The samples also showed significantly higher concentrations of NF3 in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere, which the researchers said is consistent with its use predominantly in Northern Hemisphere countries. The current observed rate of increase of NF3 in the atmosphere corresponds to emissions of about 16 percent of the amount of the gas produced globally, according to Scripps researchers. See related article: Chemical widely used in chips, LCDs under fire All materials on this site Copyright 2008 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC. All rights reserved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.