[opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- From: "Dale Kelly" <res0xtey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:40:51 -0700
> What exactly is more robust about it (COFDM)? Does the signal travel
> through air
> better? Does it bounce off buildings less?
Could it be the coded orthogonal frequency division modulation feature?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Golitsis" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:48 AM
Subject: [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
> What exactly is more robust about it? Does the signal travel through air
> better? Does it bounce off buildings less?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Miller" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> The point is not that COFDM can go to a higher bitrate but that at an
>> equal or slightly higher bitrate it is still more robust than 8-VSB.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400