[opendtv] News: Plugging Into the Net, Through the Humble Wall Outlet
- From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: OpenDTV Mail List <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:04:45 -0400
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/28/technology/circuits/28howw.html?th
Plugging Into the Net, Through the Humble Wall Outlet
By TOM McNICHOL
Published: October 28, 2004
HIGH-speed Internet access usually comes to homes through one of two
wires: a telephone line for D.S.L. subscribers, or a coaxial cable
for cable modem users. But an emerging technology known as broadband
over power lines, or B.P.L., may soon offer a third wire into homes,
channeling high-speed data through a somewhat improbable conduit: an
ordinary electrical outlet.
B.P.L. is the ultimate in plug-and-play. Users plug a small power
line modem into any wall outlet and then connect the modem to a
computer with a U.S.B. or Ethernet cable, or through a wireless Wi-Fi
connection. The appeal of B.P.L. is that most of the wiring for the
network is in place. Although data must be carefully routed over the
electric grid to prevent interference and signal degradation, there
is no need to dig up streets or rewire homes.
Two weeks ago the Federal Communications Commission adopted rule
changes to encourage the technology in the hope of making broadband
more widely available and fostering greater competition among
high-speed Internet providers.
Internet service over power lines is probably a year or more away
from becoming widely available, but the F.C.C.'s ruling is expected
to spur investment in B.P.L. by utilities.
"Three or four years ago, the technology was not ready for prime
time, but now we know it is," said Jay Birnbaum, vice president and
general counsel for Current Communications of Germantown, Md., which
makes B.P.L. equipment. "And we've gotten the cost down, so it's
competitive with other broadband services."
The idea of using electric power lines to send data is not new;
companies have been working on it for a decade. The major technical
challenge has been how to send bursts of radio frequency energy over
power lines without interfering with other radio signals,
particularly ham radio and public safety frequencies.
The recent F.C.C. ruling establishes frequency bands that B.P.L.
signals must avoid to protect aeronautical and Coast Guard
communications, and sets up a publicly available database for
resolving claims of harmful interference from private radio operators.
B.P.L. has been tested in small field trials for several years,
involving about 5,000 customers in 18 states. Cinergy, a power
company in the Midwest, recently began offering B.P.L. to homes in
the Cincinnati area for $30 to $50 a month, depending on connection
speed. The company says it hopes to have B.P.L. equipment in more
than 50,000 homes by the end of the year.
Cinergy is also marketing B.P.L. to smaller municipal and cooperative
power companies, particularly in rural areas.
"We felt those municipal and cooperative power companies are a
terrific market because many of those areas are underserved by D.S.L.
and cable," said Bill Grealis, a Cinergy executive vice president.
Adding a data channel to the power lines also has potential benefits
for the utilities themselves. By reserving a sliver of the B.P.L.
data channel for themselves, power companies can use the network to
identify problems and accomplish troubleshooting remotely, rather
than sending out a crew.
Down the road, utilities could install Internet-enabled meters and
switches to offer automated meter reading, power demand management
and time-of-day pricing.
"Our main interest in B.P.L. is using it to better manage our
utility," said Bob Dobkin, a spokesman for Pepco, which is based in
Washington. Pepco has a pilot B.P.L. program in about 500 homes in
Potomac, Md. "It enables you to identify problems without having to
send someone out."
While B.P.L. holds promise, there are unanswered questions about the
technology. One F.C.C. commissioner, Michael J. Copps, dissented in
part with the commission's recent action, saying the agency had
failed to address issues such as whether electricity customers pay
higher monthly bills to subsidize their utility's foray into
broadband.
"We're great on technology, but not so good on working out the rules
of the road," Mr. Copps said. "Nearly all of the industrialized
nations except the U.S. have national plans for broadband. We don't
have any comprehensive strategy."
Mr. Copps and others note that the United States has lately become a
broadband laggard; it ranks 13th in the world in broadband
penetration, behind countries such as Japan, Korea, Denmark and
Iceland. Many believe one main reason is cost. While Americans
typically pay $40 to $50 monthly for a D.S.L. or cable modem
connection, the Japanese, for example, pay $10 to $15 a month for
even faster connections.
American broadband consumers, in short, get less bit for the buck.
Will B.P.L. bring down the cost of broadband?
Mr. Grealis of Cinergy will say only that the cost of a B.P.L.
connection will be competitive with D.S.L., cable and wireless. It
remains to be seen whether the third wire into the home turns out to
be a cheaper alternative or more like the third gas station on a
corner, battling the competition at remarkably similar prices.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts: