-----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Aitken Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:16 PM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: New transition web site One of the "problems" wrt the Baltimore (FOX45) station and you is that by design we must provide protection to the north (York, PA) because of interference criteria of maximization. :-( Imagine the situation to ALL of our market if we had not maximized! (what is your ZIP?) [Cliff Benham] 19390. Yes, York is almost directly North of Baltimore but I am almost in a direct line between Baltimore and Philadelphia in West Grove, about 45 degrees of azimuth to the east. I used to get digital Fox 45 but not for the last couple of years. Cliff Benham wrote: -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:13 AM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: New transition web site Bert wrote: <---> In your specific case, have you tried pointing the antenna to Baltimore yet, rather than trying to receive Baltimore from behind the parabolic reflector? If Phildelphia, behind the hill, doesn't come in well, do what the Europeans do: go for the best signal source in your location. In your case, 8-VSB should be at least as good as COFDM. You're far from every transmitter, and not even in a congested location. Bert Yes I have pointed the parabolic UHF antenna towards Baltimore and the only difference was the Philly stations came in worse. Still no 'FOX' from either market. The goal here is to receive the Philly stations so I can get emergency messages and weather reports that apply to where I live. I don't get this information for my area from the Baltimore stations.