[opendtv] Re: New transition web site
- From: "Bob Miller" <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:04:23 -0500
On 3/7/07, Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 8:34 AM -0800 3/6/07, Dale Kelly wrote:
>Craig wrote:
>> You mean by demanding compensation from cable and DBS for their HDTV
>> signals as well as the analog signal that is covered by
>> re-transmission consent?
>
>John W. wrote:
>> >Aren't you tired of playing this old violin?
>
>John's comment also applies to your constant refrain......
>
Can you provide me with ANY OTHER evidence that broadcasters are
getting serious about making money with their digital service?
Broadcasters were given a valuable public resource in return for a
FREE service to the public. Now, rather than using this valuable
spectrum to create a service that the public actually wants, they are
tying up even more spectrum and to leverage a huge new revenue stream
from competitors.
I will continue to play this song until the spectrum is made
available to competitors who will actually use it for services that
the public will use. Unfortunately, when the spectrum is auctioned
the new uses will NOT be free.
You mean that the new owners will not have gotten the spectrum for
free and therefore cannot use it like broadcasters do and provide free
OTA programming.
I disagree. No matter what anyone pays for the spectrum in the
upcoming and past auctions of channels above 51, once they have paid
the cash that money is sunk, gone and should not be considered in the
decision of what to do with the spectrum.
The buyers should have made those decisions before spending the money.
Now that they own the spectrum they are in the same boat as anyone
else that owns similar spectrum. Theoretically, no not theoretically,
in fact there is only ONE use for that spectrum that will garner the
most profit. That is there is only one truth. Whether any buyer knows
what that is or even comes close to finding it is another matter.
All owners of the spectrum have to try to find the best use for the
spectrum, that which makes the most money and that has nothing to do
with what they paid for the spectrum. Maybe they paid too much for
even the one true best use, maybe they paid very little. Whatever that
is past history. The reality is that that money is gone, sunk, as if
you had burned it. The future value of that spectrum will depend on
what you do with it and how profitable that venture is.
What this spectrum could be sold for to another entity that has
another idea of what the true best use is can be anything. Look at
what Mark Cuban sold Broadcast.com for.
Once the cash is spent the buyers could find that the best use for the
most profit could be free OTA.
Bob Miller
Henny Youngman could have done a whole comedy routine on this one...
Regards
Craig
I don't mind when my horse is left at the post. I don't mind when my
horse comes up to me in the stands and asks "Which way do I go?" But
when the horse I bet on is at the $2 window betting on another horse
in the same race...
Henny Youngman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
