> Thanks for sharing you newly informed observation with us, Tom. You spent
> much effort, IIRC, on previously telling us we were wrong. >Uhh, actually I was on the other side of that argument, being the one usually claiming that is where TV is headed for those who mostly watch the nets and don't usually pay for premium zillion channel packages. But there were many opinions then and I don't remember if you had one or who said what when.
More specifically, I'm claiming the Lifeline Cable crowd will still be able to watch their Lifeline cable, in HDTV, at Lifeline cable prices and that they will choose to do so once that option becomes obvious.
> Also, I noted some months ago that using a QAM tuner, one> can also watch some premium channels, and that was on Cox Cable San Diego. > Funny you didn't mention that "feature" with Cox Cable Gainesville, a much,
> much smaller system. >Dunno about San Diego but AFAIK here on Cox in Gainesville I cannot receive ANY digital premium stations (even SDTV) without paying for them, on any of my equipment. They are all encrypted.
- Tom John Willkie wrote:
I believe that was "your" impression, however, the informed -- that is, people who have actually tried -- impression was something different, in line with your current experience. Thanks for sharing you newly informed observation with us, Tom. You spent much effort, IIRC, on previously telling us we were wrong. I'd be interested in hearing of these exceptions, as they violate FCC part 15 regulations, which could involve very expensive fines against the retailer, distributor and importer. You see, with laws, it's not the compliance that's news; it's non-compliance. Also, I noted some months ago that using a QAM tuner, one can also watch some premium channels, and that was on Cox Cable San Diego. Funny you didn't mention that "feature" with Cox Cable Gainesville, a much, much smaller system. John Willkie -----Mensaje original----- De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Tom Barry Enviado el: Sunday, October 21, 2007 11:04 AM Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: [opendtv] Re: My new TV supports QAMI believe the last time it was discussed here we left it that the low end digital sets probably did not have unencrypted QAM support. My post was another data point to that discussion. But if everyone else remembers differently then please excuse the redundancy.Again, I believe sets like my new one with QAM will likely become the standard expectation for "cable ready" and "lifeline cable" going forward but some digital TV's are still likely exceptions this year.- Tom John Willkie wrote:Tom; Having DTV capability means it can receive 8-VSB and QAM. You must nothavebeen paying attention hereabouts the several times this has beendiscussed.It's actually in the rules. Think: cable plug and play. How could you expect that to work if the tv sets didn't receive QAM? John Willkie ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings atFreeLists.org- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the wordunsubscribe in the subject line.
-- Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
