[opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:30:09 -0400
At 2:38 PM +0200 8/18/06, Hoffmann, Hans wrote:
......so what do you think: how much bit-rate would be required for a
1080p/60 emission format using e.g. MPEG-4 AVC?
1: equal to 1080i/30 (average critical material)
2: less than 1080i/30 (how much with average critical materail - percentage)
3: more than 1080i/30 (""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" - percentage)
Regards,
Hans
Good question Hans.
The answer is a bit tricky, as it is dependent on the actual
information content of the images that are encoded, and their
relative quality in terms of entropy (i.e. the accuracy of the
samples).
Keep in mind that the average frequencies of most of what we and a
camera see, are lower than the high frequency details that may exist
in any imagery. This is the major reason that TV has worked so well
for decades, and the reason why cinematographers go out of their way
to prevent the acquisition of high levels of detail (e.g through the
use of filters and depth of field to eliminate detail outside of the
critical focus plane).
As we add resolution to any image two things typically happen:
1. The accuracy of the samples that represent lower frequency
information improve - this helps entropy encoders.
2. We acquire more detail - some of this information will be very
accurate, and some will not. This stresses an entropy encoder in two
ways: you need more bits to represent the extra information and you
need more bits to deal with the entropy (distorted information).
So the answer is that you will need more bits in complex scenes,
while in average scenes you might actually need the same or even less
bits. It will all depend on the quality of the images produce by the
camera. I would also add that the higher frame rate, and elimination
of interlace will help with the motion compensated prediction
routines in the entropy coder, which can produce major gains in
coding efficiency. But this ALSO requires good sample accuracy, which
is more difficult to achieve as the frame rates increase.
I would note that most recording systems for 1080 line HD cameras
today, downsample to 1440 or 1280 samples per line prior to
compression. The main reason for this is the high levels of entropy
in the full 1920 x 1080 raster. Since these cameras do not
oversample, they cannot do a good job of capturing information at the
highest frequencies possible for the 1920 x 1080 raster. Typically
there is a fairly high level of noise at the highest frequencies, due
to the sensitivity limitations of the sensors (i.e. the number of
photons hitting each sensor site).
Large CMOS sensors (higher sample counts and larger physical size)
may help with the sensitivity issue, and the resulting images can be
resampled to help eliminate sampling errors. But we are still not
there with this technology.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- From: Hoffmann, Hans
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- » [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
......so what do you think: how much bit-rate would be required for a 1080p/60 emission format using e.g. MPEG-4 AVC?
1: equal to 1080i/30 (average critical material)
2: less than 1080i/30 (how much with average critical materail - percentage)
3: more than 1080i/30 (""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" - percentage)
Regards, Hans
Good question Hans.
- [opendtv] Re: Microsoft Exec: 1080p HDTV Is Meaningless
- From: Hoffmann, Hans