[opendtv] Re: MPAA wants to stop DVRs from recording some movies
- From: John Willkie <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
It's hard to believe that he doesn't beat her all day long, and then resumes at
dusk. Or, perhaps she beats him all day long, and he takes it out on us.
Perhaps he gets a bonus for it.
John Willkie
-----Original Message-----
>From: Adam Goldberg <adam_g@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 29, 2008 9:08 PM
>To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [opendtv] Re: MPAA wants to stop DVRs from recording some movies
>
>Ok, that's interesting.
>
>Here's my corollary. You haven't told me that you think broccoli is icky.
>Therefore, CLEARLY, you LOVE broccoli. Another is, when did you stop
>beating your wife?
>
>THEY SAID NOTHING ABOUT THIS. NOTHING. NOTHING. The FCC, in 00-341, made
>ABSOLUTELY NO JUDGEMENT about this!!!
>
>Now I'm done. I'll no longer read this thread.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of Albert Manfredi
>Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:40 PM
>To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [opendtv] Re: MPAA wants to stop DVRs from recording some movies
>
>
>Adam Goldberg wrote:
>
>> FCC 00-341 says NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING about this.
>
>We disagree. By refusing to make a decision, the FCC gives MVPDs carte
>blanche wrt copy protection, which OTA broadcasters do not have. In effect,
>that is taking a stand.
>
>I'll indulge in some of the same "logical" thinking we see on here from
>[expletive deleted].
>
>If a book author wants to display his book in my house, I am well within my
>rights to negotiate my terms with him. As in, "sure, go ahead and display
>it, but only IF YOU AGREE to let me quote from it, make photocopies of
>certain sections for my own use, or for other uses I specify ahead of time.
>
>That is what the US Govt is doing here, ON OUR BEHALF. It is saying to
>content owners and to broadcasters, "If you guys want to air this content
>over the RF spectrum owned by the public, and which broadcasters are
>allotted on condition of following certain rules, THEN we, the people, are
>going to negotiate the terms.
>
>"Our terms are [Betamax case, 17 USC 1201]. If you don't like our terms, we
>agree that you own the content and have rights to it, so please take your
>content elsewhere for display."
>
>And more, we, the people, are saying to broadcasters that if they want to
>use the publically-owned TV RF spectrum, they have to transmit at least one
>free and clear SDTV stream. Or take their business elsewhere.
>
>By the way, I think it is the tactic of the complete idiots and morons to
>try to silence opposing points of view through insults. Deep down, pathetic,
>self-loathing bullies and narcisists. No one worthy of respect, for sure.
>Surely, we can agree on that much?
>
>Bert
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Watch "Cause Effect," a show about real people making a real difference.
>Learn more.
>http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_watchcause
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>FreeLists.org
>
>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>FreeLists.org
>
>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
