[opendtv] Re: MIMO
- From: Mark Aitken <maitken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:49:26 -0400
1995-1999, many tests of C-pol vs. H-pol, were conducted, and the
results had one thinking that there was no improvement (there HAD been
much noted improvement for NTSC). Knowing now what we know about the
early receivers, there is much "rethinking" going on...particularly wrt
mobile and small whip/stick antennae. There is little doubt in my mind
that there IS an improvement. There is some new work being started (i.e.
the AFCCE upcoming meeting with a discussion by Kerry Cozad of
Dielectric). Much more work will happen....
Cliff Benham wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Shutt
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 2:29 PM
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: MIMO
My question remains unanswered. How much testing has ever been done on
ATSC rception using circular polarization? How well does it actually work
compared to the sputtering, freezing, choppy ATSC 'reception' I now endure?
John.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cliff Benham" <flyback1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
For ATSC this idea seems like a huge miss. Where was it 10 years ago?
I have not ever seen this expressed anywhere before now.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
<> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Regards,
Mark A. Aitken
Director, Advanced Technology
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
===================================
Sinclair Broadcast Group
10706 Beaver Dam Road
Hunt Valley, MD 21030
===================================
Business TEL: (410) 568-1535
Business MOBILE: (443) 677-4425
Business FAX: (410) 568-1580
E-mail: maitken@xxxxxxxxxx
Text PAGE: page.maitken@xxxxxxxxxx
HTML PAGE: 4436774425@xxxxxxxxxx
www.newscentral.tv
www.sbgi.net
===================================
"Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic."
------- Arthur C. Clarke -------
===================================
"We live in a society exquisitely
dependent on science and technology,
in which hardly anyone knows anything
about science and technology."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Carl Sagan ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
===================================
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- From: Cliff Benham
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- » [opendtv] Re: MIMO
-----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Shutt Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 2:29 PM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: MIMO
My question remains unanswered. How much testing has ever been done on ATSC rception using circular polarization? How well does it actually work compared to the sputtering, freezing, choppy ATSC 'reception' I now endure?John.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Cliff Benham" <flyback1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
For ATSC this idea seems like a huge miss. Where was it 10 years ago? I have not ever seen this expressed anywhere before now.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
- [opendtv] Re: MIMO
- From: Cliff Benham