[opendtv] Re: Local Content Considered Key to Mobile DTV Adoption
- From: "Peter Wilson" <peter.wilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:44:15 -0000
You may find this link interesting.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8426104.stm
Best Regards,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E
Sent: 21 December 2009 23:03
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Local Content Considered Key to Mobile DTV Adoption
Craig Birkmaier wrote:
> Broadcasters cannot break out of the one program per time slot
> business model because they cannot afford to. Content costs
> money and delivering more than one program is viewed as diluting
> the audience for the one program they want you to watch.
>
> But the major reason you will not see cable networks delivered
> via FOTA DTV is that the broadcasters have no mechanism to
> collect subscriber fees. They NEED cable and DBS to collect
> retrans consent subscriber fees to keep broadcasting solvent a
> bit longer. So the possibility of a U.S. Freeview style system
> is highly unlikely, at least until broadcasting and cable as we
> know them die.
You've said exactly the same thing on multiple occasions, but when it
doesn't make sense the first time, it continues not to make sense. OTA
broadcasters will most liely continue to collect retrans consent fees,
because the MVPDs are not going out of business before broadcasters do. This
is all about small market adjustments, not all or nothing changes.
If broadcasters transmit more than one interesting stream, they will get a
larger share of the FOTA audience, either to watch the main program, or the
multicasts. Wow. Just like MVPDs do, but on a smaller scale.
To afford the material, they air ads. If the multicasts are the sort of MUCH
cheaper programs you see on cable networks, don't you think it becomes
easier for the ad revenues to cover the costs?
> And stop with this greater spectral efficiency for OTA bull.
Well, let's do the numbers, Craig. With NTSC, a local broadcaster could only
transmit the network programming, only have the fraction of viewership
interested in that program, and only get ad revenue from the ads airing
during that program.
With ATSC, the local broadcaster can treansmit at least 4 programs streams,
potentially attracting more viewers than only those interested in the "main"
network channel, and consequently, sell more ads.
So yes, 4 streams, one of which is HDTV, plus the M/H streams, vs 1 stream
sounds like a whole lot more spectral efficiency to me. And the white space
argument you try to make is bogus. Withness that they are trying the same
technique in DVB-T land.
> USDTV TRIED AND FAILED.
Obviously. People who like paying the monthly fee are a lot better off with
DBS or cable.
> Why do you think Congress and the FCC are pushing this National
> Broadband agenda?
C'est la cause du jour, much like limiting your carbon footprint. They've
latched onto needing more spectrum, even though the ones that know these
things have told them it's not needed for quite some time. I see a parallel
here.
Bert
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
