Craig Birkmaier wrote: >> Craig, your a few years too late; they've already spent that >> money on the current new system. > > Sorry Dale, but I still have little sympathy. The investment > to date is relatively small, and many of the assets that have > been acquired will continue to have value if used properly in > the new infrastructure. I have little sympathy for the entire thread, as long as the only issue on the table is use of large area SFNs. I think Dale was being very gracious and overly diplomatic. There is nothing written anywhere that insists that large area SFNs are *the* way to create the "proper infrastructure" you speak of. It's simply not supported by the facts. It makes a lot more sense to design a proper and reliable infrastructure without basing its design on a bad idea. Any scheme that is bound by the laws of physics to create variable dead zones, which will change shape according to multiple factors including weather conditions, and which requires use of many more towers than otherwise needed, in my book qualifies as improper use of spectrum. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.