Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Why would broadcasters want to piss off the multichannel > distributors, now that they can get $0.50 to $1.00 per month > per subscriber without lifiting a finger? > > The alternative is to change the business model entirely so > that they can compete and collect these fees themselves. Well, broadcasters do have to provide programming that subscribers are willing to pay their basic rates for, at least. So that's not "without lifting a finger." But it should also be possible for broadcasters to pay the cable companies for carriage, but then they, i.e. the broadcasters and/or the conglomerates, get all the ad revenues. The conglomerates could do this for all of the content they provide to cable, not just the content that is broadcast by the local stations. And these conglomerates could decide on their own what they will also transmit OTA and what stays on umbillical systems only. I'm just not convinced that the cable and DBS companies would prefer this approach. Reason being, the subscription services would lose a lot of control. They would just become a local gatekeeper. The advantage is that these conglomerates would have an incentive to make better use of their OTA medium, or at least no disincentive to do so, as they have today. The affiliated stations would more or less be just another distribution service. The OEOs would be the one distribution channel with no middlemen involved. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.