Terry Harvey wrote: > One consideration was left out of the flawed > thought process below. As with Cable and Satellite > STBs: why would anyone want one of those? The answer, > of course, is to receive services one cannot receive > with an integrated receiving device. Perhaps the real > problem with DTV OTA is that there is very little which > is compelling to watch which would justify the expenditure. I'm not sure what exactly flaws Terry found in my post, but I'll agree that a great DTT value proposition would stimulate demand for both integrated and stand-alone receiving devices. That's mostly a function of content, I believe. If somebody is proposing a hypothetical killer service offering that is ONLY available via DTT STB, then I'll concede that it would increase demand for stand-alone receivers. I don't think we've seen one yet, though. > Blaming the 8VSB transmission system to me is a cop out... Sorry, but which part of my post sounded like I was blaming the transmission system? Or am I misunderstanding Terry's response? I'm not an engineer, and I have no interest in getting sucked into the ongoing rants about 8VSB, either pro or con. I'm hoping to confine my observations to market characteristics. Cheers, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.