John Shutt wrote: >Bert, > >You fail to mention HAAT for the Berlin towers, and until that is known, you >can't know where the radio horizon is, nor how much more power is required >to reach further. If the Berlin towers are at 150 feet HAAT, the radio >horizon is only 17 miles away. > >Far field reception of COFDM was not a problem in the 1999 Sinclair tests, >nor was it a problem in the flawed MSTV tests (successful reception up to 55 >miles away.) With identical ERP and HAAT, you would be hard pressed to >notice a difference in reception between the two in the far field. > > Actually there was a difference between the two in the far field. When Sinclair went back with a "receiver" that had a decent front end and tested seven sites in the far field where COFDM had failed it now worked at all seven. 8-VSB had not worked at one of those seven sites. If you go on single point data to a conclusion then COFDM was better in the far field. Bob Miller >Stop reading numbers and start getting some real world experience. > >If I were to take Jay's brother's experience, it seems that the first and >oldest Motorola box he had worked best. His two newer ones didn't work as >well, so am I to assume from his experience that later generation ATSC boxes >are worse than earlier ones? You can't generalize from a single anecdotal >incident. > >John > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >>The Berlin coverage contour for Channel 44 was 12 to >>14 miles with indoor antenna, with a two-tower 170 KW >>ERP per tower SFN, using 16-QAM and 2/3 FEC >>(2.1 b/s/Hz). >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.