[opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- From: "Dale Kelly" <dalekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 10:19:53 -0800
> we found that NTSC receivers designed for
> 59.94 didn't even have problems at 50.
That was also my experience in Europe, during the 60s, while using an NTSC
B&W TV. Never a problem locking to 625/50 signal. The audio circuitry
required modification to demodulate the higher carrier frequency and, of
course, the set could not display the full broadcast video bandwidth but
it's performance was comparable to good NTSC.
TV sets would have never worked with many early VCRs had they not had broad
range sync detectors.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Schubin
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 8:28 AM
> To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- From: Mark Schubin
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- From: Mark Schubin