[opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- From: "John Shutt" <shuttj@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:35:08 -0500
Bert,
Did you see the posting by Russ Wood?
I'm talking about the extra headaches on the production side that those odd
framerates cause. 23.976, 29.97, and 59.94 (all approximations, as they
really are the whole number framerate divided by 1.001) are for "NTSC
compatibility" and allows us to use NTSC blackburst for genlocking of our HD
equipment. I admit that it makes things a bit easier to have a single
reference in-house for all video.
However, it does cause editing problems with timecode, as there is no
current standard for 23.976 or 59.94 drop frame timecode. An issue that I'm
sure will soon be addressed by SMPTE and/or the Masked Engineer. (You might
not have noticed that...)
Since HD material needs to go through a downconverter before it can be used
in SD, and likewise SD material needs to be upconverted before it can be
used in HD, the slight framerate difference could be tackled at the same
time that the .
As a consumer of content, you should be fully insulated from these issues,
just as I am insulated from network timestamp issues. You are absolutely
right that as far as ATSC is concerned, it can work with any of those
framerates.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
John, as far as I can tell, these frame rates should continue to be
convenient in ATSC for as long as any box out there converts the DTV
signal into NTSC with video and audio (RF, essentially). Right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- From: Manfredi, Albert E
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- » [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
John, as far as I can tell, these frame rates should continue to be convenient in ATSC for as long as any box out there converts the DTV signal into NTSC with video and audio (RF, essentially). Right?
- [opendtv] Re: Half Truths - Was More 1080p@60
- From: Manfredi, Albert E